The images were collected using a Canon EOS Rebel T3i camera riding on a Fornax Mounts LighTrack II. Without the blurb I would have taken it as a 24 hour news studio shot with back projection or a cut and paste layer.The other stuff is really nice though. +1 for the 135mm lens. It seems lazy to me. f2, very sharp, virtually without CAs, contrast, colour, lightwight, buildings. It is a parade of photos that should have been galled out after a boring Sunday afternoon shoot of "Think I'll bring along a camera when I walk the dog", There are so many things wrong in this 'review' -- most of all the idea that 'you' should get this lens and somehow it magically makes the duck or the cat stuck right in the center of picture a great photo! I just wish this lens had IS for low light and portraits with flash. This article was originally published on Micael's blog, and is being republished in full with express permission. Barney and Chris have been shooting the new Sony 50mm F1.4 GM, and we have a bunch of full resolution samples for you to peruse. Unfortunately, standard photography lenses are generally poorly corrected for CA at the red end of the spectrum, relying on the human eye's poorer resolution in red than green or blue. Please ride off on the same horse you rode in on. Exposure uniformity (vignetting) is also really excellent, reaching a maximum of 1/4 EV (on a camera with an APS-C size sensor) at f/2, and dropping to well under 1/10 EV at f/2.8 and above. It is good to know that the 200/4 SMC Takumar is good. Although typically unused in astrophotography, I did get a chance to see the beautiful bokeh this lens creates when shooting at F/2. But I would argue that a 135mm F2 lens produces even greater bokeh, thanks to the long focal length that compresses the background far more than the 85mm lens. AF ring feels loose compared to my other L lenses. @ Juksu - you're pathologically clueless. So now your 42Mpix A7rII is only a 10.5Mpix. Write your own user review for this lens. With todays huge variety of digital sensors, each with their own characteristics, in-camera and post-processing etc., much depends on the given combination of your photo gear to create a certain effect. In fact, in my test shots, I noticed that the red channel was a little softer than green and blue. The latter are designed for crop sensor cameras and the back of the lens sticks too far into the body of the camera and would hit the EOS-clip filter. I mount it on my APS-C camera and the focal length literally becomes 216 mm, which is too tight. Whats the best camera for around $2000? For those of you that like to pixel-peep, have a look at the single image frame captured using the Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC at F/4. Prime means that this lens is fixed at 135mm, it is not a zoom lens that allows for focal length adjustments. By far the best one is the Tiffen Haze 2 filter. No rear seals - since the 17-40 Canon has added rear seals to L lenses, to help in weather sealing. "If you are a Nikon user, of course have a look at the Nikon AF Nikkor 135mm f/2D DC and compare it to the other lenses mentioned in this article. you can see here a lot of photos mostly shot with the f/4 version. This lens has the Pentax K bayonet mount, and requires the K-EOS adapter for attachment to Canon EOS cameras. (purchased for $900), reviewed April 15th, 2011 FULL FRAME TELEPHOTO 135mm F2.0 Please re-enable javascript to access full functionality. The foolproof image seems to be more a case of how a bright fuzzy cluttered moving background can completely detach from the offset dark subject matter and overwhelm it. They were not however designed to be bokeh monsters though that was just a side effect of making them fast and people bought them for speed with bokeh being the afterthought so not Bokeh for the sake of Bokeh as he said. I ordered this lens on Amazon, utilizing my Amazon Prime membership. Most of these APOs have F ratios around 6.5, and are unable to comprehend in their field of view large celestial objects such as the Andromeda galaxy, the North America nebula, and comets. For this reason, a combination of a good light pollution filter, and the use of flat calibration frames are recommended. Sure, not all 135mm lenses are lightweightSigma's new 135mm F1.8 is rather heavy at 1130gbut if you look at the Samyang 135mm F2, which is pretty much flawless optically, it weighs only 830g. I will say that at F/4 this lens is extremely sharp corner to corner when used on my 60Da. The sigma 150mm f2.8 tests very well, zeiss 135mm apo sonnar, and leica 180mm f3.5 apo all proven performers on star tests. If 135mm f2 works for you, then fine. Some people may disagree with the vignetting being a good thing or not, but thats a matter of taste I guess. The following image was captured by Eric Cauble using the Samyang branded version of this lens. As you'd expect from a premium prime lens, both maximum and average chromatic aberration is very low across the aperture range, with the maximum CA on the order of 0.02% of frame height regardless of aperture. (purchased for $845), reviewed November 16th, 2005 If anything the argument in favor of even smaller and lighter 85/1.4s (like the 600g Sigma DN) is stronger than ever, and I say that as someone that loves shooting at 135-150mm. Build quality: excellent. We always expect to see some drop in performance (particularly corner sharpness) when we move from testing on a sub-frame to a full-frame camera, but the 135mm f/2L turned in a really remarkable performance even at full-frame. Focus end stop. The Rho Ophiuchi Cloud Complex by Eric Cauble using the Samyang 135mm F/2 lens. - in my subjects' skin. It has just a hint of chromatic aberration on very bright stars and, if highly enlarged by 400-800%, the stars in the very corners barely begin to show a touch of astigmatism. I hear great things about the Canon 200/2.8 L but do not have one. I used this lens quite a bit years ago as my main working lens. The 135mm F2 lens design is truly special, and in this article (and the video I made), I want to try to convince you as well. The Sadr Region in Cygnus, including the Crescent Nebula by Eric Cauble. Fast. The author's recipe for a good photo is:1) Just shoot blindly, with no regard to what's in the frame, because the lens will blur away everything on the background.2) If (1) does not work, just head on to https://www.bhphotovideo.com, download a jpg of the lens you were using, and photoshop it on top of the taillaits of the passig car that didn't get blurred out enough.3?) We take OM System's new 90mm prime F3.5 macro lens out and about around Seattle, in search of sunlight, people and very tiny things to get up close and personal with. http://www.radiantlite.com/2009/01/canon-135mm-f2l-usm-mini-review.html The only thing that could possibly make this better would be to add IS. Cost. In fact, it might be fun to try! And with our first long lenses we were all impressed were we not? I have heard others mention that this lens has a plasticky build quality, but I believe this aspect has been improved. 135mm F2.0 The optical design includes one extra-low dispersion lens element to control chromatic aberration, contributing to sharp, color-accurate imaging, and each of its lens elements features Ultra Multi-Coating to improve light transmission and reduce ghosting and flare. After several years off, the venerable magazine has held a public open call photo contest and selected nine finalists and one winning image for its 'Photos of the Year.'. So I sold it for nearly what I bought it for and chalked it up to a learning experience. This way you get both lenses with only one! Stage photography is another good use for the 135 L. I hope that this post has provided some practical insight into a popular camera lens for astrophotography. Why would I want a 135/2.0 lens when I have a 135/1.8? Yes, she's isolated. Just not useful if you already have traditional focal lengths. lol, nice images, and i nearly bought this lens myself a few years ago. (purchased for $700), reviewed October 9th, 2012 Yes, there is some sharpness added when stopping down to f4 or f5.6 but after that it doesn't get better. To see even more example photos using the Rokinon 135mm lens (or Samyang branded version), go ahead a perform a search on Astrobin or Flickr, with the appropriate filter. And in their task to get that blurry background, they most often throw their main subject out of focus and/or to focus for anything else in the photograph that would make it, and end results are just "gear porn". Both the 135 and 200mm Canon l lenses are winners IMHO. #light_bulb I would disagree. Really, just an amazing lens, easily worth the $800-900 it commands on the street. I really don't want to count all the pores - and the hairs coming out of them (eeeew!) Another drawback is the focal length. If you aren't completely set on the 135mm, the 200mm f/2.8L is a fantastic lens and i think its less expensive than the 135mm f/2L. One of the prime examples of such a design is the "nifty fifty"the 50mm F1.8 lens construction that many lens manufacturers provide. With weather sealing this would be a 10. Best lens for portraiture I've ever tried. One of my very best lenses! I dont mean to be rude, but I fail to see any photographic comparison or test to display the quality of this lens against others, concerning coma or anything else, except considerations on the manual focusing, its shape and ergonomic. My copy is 12-years-old and still delivers at over 75 weddings a year. Over the last ten to fifteen years excellent apochromatic telescopes have become available for visual use and photography. I really wanted to use, and like, a 135mm f2 lens so I bought the Canon version. Digital sensors are roughly 5 times as sharp as 400-speed film. Some people like these, and consider them decorative. I wish every lens was this good!! It is worth of it's price?Any links to astrophotos with this lens?Thanks. Yuri toropin tests a bunch of lenses on Flickr which is a great source. However, I am convinced that its large aperture and fast F ratio would perform exceptionally well in three color or narrow band H-alpha and OIII photography. Super sharp from f2. Released only weeks apart, the Sony 50mm F1.4 GM and Sigma F1.4 DG DN Art are clear competitors. With a good smartphone, some creative legwork, and the photos scaled down as they are in this article you can make photos that at least just as good. Geometric distortion is lower than one would expect, at 0.15% pincushion maximum, with an average of 0.07%. I can only guarantee that the TSAPO65Q would work very well. What I see is a photographer who should maybe instead stick to the kit lens, and learn composition first. Smooth but contrasty. Its fast f/2.0 maximum aperture is effective in low light and enables shallow depth of field control. What is it like shooting with one today? The lens hood is not petal-shaped, which is great news for those using this lens for astrophotography. Plus it is harder to attach than other lens hoods. But when holes in text prompt me to look at the work of the writer, there is nothing professional there either. If you have the 1.8 version, way to go. Im getting a samyang to use with my 60D. So there - it is not a perfect object. Canon 135 mm is really E X T R A O R D I N A R Y lens. There's literally no story!#6: Purple Flower.The isolation works because it's the only color. Juksu, your point is well taken. here are some links to some pics taken with the lens: My 24-70L needs to be stopped down to f5.6 to begin to match the sharpness of my 135L at f2.0 (the test shots were of the portrait of Andrew Jackson on a $20 bill). All content, design, and layout are Copyright 19982023 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved. We were very impressed with X-T5's 40-megapixel APS-C sensor, check out some full resolution images! So, let's see where it falls short of perfection: As I posted on the Petapixel variant of this article, cropping a 85/1.4 shot to a 135mm-equivalent FoV gives you approx. At the other end of the aperture range though, the 5D's larger pixels actually help matters, as the softening starts later (it's very sharp even at f/16), and is noticeably lower at f/32. For my purposes, this is a spectacular lens. Well, if you consider downloading a lens image from https://www.bhphotovideo.com, and photoshop it on top of my photos to cover mistakes, and demonstrate sharpness of a lens with a jpeg that is way oversharpened; if you call knowledge that "the long focal length compresses the background" , If you call blurr a bokeh just because it sounds better, and so on 1000 words would not be enough to point out what a mess this review is Then you are right, I absolutely do not know as much as he does.
How To Respond To A Cancelled Job Interview,
How To Remove Light Cover From Hunter Ceiling Fan,
What Does Miguel Steal From Ernesto De La Cruz Quizlet,
Probability Of Nuclear War 2022,
Articles C
